Well I have just spent a couple of hours plodding through the dog food analasys web site (linked on this thread) and am now even more confused than when I started. Foods are rated from one to six stars.
IAMS recommended by my vet is 2 star and generally panned.
Royal Canin, so popular on this site is rated 2 star with poor ingredients like wheat, soya, beet pulp and chicken fat. receives poor reviews across the range. If you are interested its in the two star group around pages 30-34.
Chudleys, recommended by my breeder (along with Bakers!) is another rated poorly.
James Wellbeloved scrapes into 3 star but ony just.
Burns, too much grains, not enough meat, which seems to be a common complaint across most dry dog foods.
Surprised how many of the popular brands are poorly rated.
I think the site is probably American as so many of the foods I have never heard of and some well known brands (Hill's Science Diet e.g.) could not be found.
Rather struck by the packaging which often features pictures of romping healthy dogs with lots of words like natural, holistic, science, nature, vet, etc. very prominant.
I think we are being conned to spend lots of money on poor products and those of you that are prepared to make up you own foods are the real heros and are probably doing the best for your dogs.