I have just been catching up on this thread and I am really saddened that this breeder is deceiving people into parting with a lot of money and not only not testing his dogs but lying about any previous history of PRA.
I hate to be blunt and I appreciate that emotional attachements get formed very easily but I would not be prepared to give this man my money. Whilst people are still willing to buy them he will keep breeding untested dogs. It is only when we start to walk away from breeders like this they they get the message.
Elaine, I am sorry to hear about your story but it sounds like you have done a fabulous job and should be very proud, what a lucky poo to have such fab owners!
With regards to testing and approved breeders this needs to be a water tight system. Prospective puppy owners will look to the approved breeder list as some kind of reassurance that the breeder has been checked and is a good choice. I still believe that it is a positive move to have an approved breeder scheme but as long as it is managed properly. The problem with any inspection system is that it needs to be monitored on an ongoing basis. This applies to all types of inspection, I have seen it with ofsted, eveyone panics about an ofsted inspection and yet routines and admin get relaxed once it is over and they know they wont be seen again for another three years. Ofsted inspectors are paid however the breeder scheme is run by volunteers doing this because they are passionate about the breed. I am sure lessons will be learnt however I don't think the whole 'idea' should be doubted.